<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Matevž Gačnik's Weblog - Microsoft</title>
    <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Technology Philanthropy</description>
    
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Matevz Gacnik</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:07:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813</generator>
    <managingEditor>matevz.gacnik@gmail.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>matevz.gacnik@gmail.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
During exploration of <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee790974.aspx">high
availability</a> (HA) features of Windows Server AppFabric <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/ee695849.aspx">Distributed
Cache</a> I needed to generate enough load in a short timeframe. You know, to kill
a couple of servers.
</p>
        <p>
This is what came out of it.
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/velocitytool.png" />
        </p>
        <p>
It's a simple command line tool, allowing you to:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
Add millions of objects of arbitrary size to the cache cluster (using <font face="Courier New">cache.Add()</font>) 
</li>
          <li>
Put objects of arbitraty size to cache cluster 
</li>
          <li>
Get objects back 
</li>
          <li>
Remove objects from cache 
</li>
          <li>
Has cluster support 
</li>
          <li>
Has local cache support 
</li>
          <li>
Will list configuration 
</li>
          <li>
Will max out you local processors (using .NET 4 <font face="Courier New">Parallel.For()</font>) 
</li>
          <li>
Will perform graceously, even in times of trouble</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
I talked about this at a recent <a href="http://slodug.si/blogs/system/archive/2010/12/03/zadnje-leto-nje-sre-anje-slodug-v-sredo-8-12.aspx">Users
Group</a> meeting, doing a live demo of cache clusters under load.
</p>
        <p>
Typical usage scenario is:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
Configure a HA cluster<br />
Remember, 3 nodes minimum, Windows Server 2008 (R2) Enterprise or DataCenter 
</li>
          <li>
Configure a HA cache 
</li>
          <li>
Edit <font face="Courier New">App.config</font>, list all available servers 
</li>
          <li>
Connect to cluster 
</li>
          <li>
Put a bunch of large objects (generate load)<br />
Since AppFabric currently supports only partitioned cache type, this will distribute
load among all cluster hosts. Thus, all hosts will store 1/N percent of objects. 
</li>
          <li>
Stop one node 
</li>
          <li>
Get all objects back<br />
Since cache is in HA mode, you will get all your objects back, even though a host
is down - cluster will redistribute all the missing cache regions to running nodes.</li>
        </ol>
        <p>
You can download the tool <a href="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/appfabriccachetool.zip">here</a>.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81" />
      </body>
      <title>Load Test Tool for Windows Server AppFabric Distributed Cache</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
During exploration of &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee790974.aspx"&gt;high
availability&lt;/a&gt; (HA) features of Windows Server AppFabric &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/ee695849.aspx"&gt;Distributed
Cache&lt;/a&gt; I needed to generate enough load in a short timeframe. You know, to kill
a couple of servers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is what came out of it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/velocitytool.png"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It's a simple command line tool, allowing you to:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Add millions of objects of arbitrary size to the cache cluster (using &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;cache.Add()&lt;/font&gt;) 
&lt;li&gt;
Put objects of arbitraty size to cache cluster 
&lt;li&gt;
Get objects back 
&lt;li&gt;
Remove objects from cache 
&lt;li&gt;
Has cluster support 
&lt;li&gt;
Has local cache support 
&lt;li&gt;
Will list configuration 
&lt;li&gt;
Will max out you local processors (using .NET 4 &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Parallel.For()&lt;/font&gt;) 
&lt;li&gt;
Will perform graceously, even in times of trouble&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I talked about this at a recent &lt;a href="http://slodug.si/blogs/system/archive/2010/12/03/zadnje-leto-nje-sre-anje-slodug-v-sredo-8-12.aspx"&gt;Users
Group&lt;/a&gt; meeting, doing a live demo of cache clusters under load.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Typical usage scenario is:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Configure a HA cluster&lt;br&gt;
Remember, 3 nodes minimum, Windows Server 2008 (R2) Enterprise or DataCenter 
&lt;li&gt;
Configure a HA cache 
&lt;li&gt;
Edit &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;App.config&lt;/font&gt;, list all available servers 
&lt;li&gt;
Connect to cluster 
&lt;li&gt;
Put a bunch of large objects (generate load)&lt;br&gt;
Since AppFabric currently supports only partitioned cache type, this will distribute
load among all cluster hosts. Thus, all hosts will store 1/N percent of objects. 
&lt;li&gt;
Stop one node 
&lt;li&gt;
Get all objects back&lt;br&gt;
Since cache is in HA mode, you will get all your objects back, even though a host
is down - cluster will redistribute all the missing cache regions to running nodes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can download the tool &lt;a href="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/appfabriccachetool.zip"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ba7b66b1-e6c6-4f49-acc0-3a3f7c32cf81.aspx</comments>
      <category>.NET 4.0 - General</category>
      <category>Architecture</category>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
On Monday, 05/18/2009 I'm speaking at <a href="http://www.documentinteropinitiative.org/">Document
Interop Initiative</a> in London, England.
</p>
        <p>
Title of the talk is: <em>High Fidelity Programmatic Access to Document Content</em>,
which will cover the following topics:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
Importance of OOXML as a standards based format, especially in technical issues of
long term storage for document content preservation 
</li>
          <li>
Importance of legal long term storage for document formats 
</li>
          <li>
Signature and timestamp benefits of long term XML formats 
</li>
          <li>
Performance and actual cost analysis of using publicly-parsable formats 
</li>
          <li>
Benefits of having a high fidelity programmatic access to document content, backed
with standardization</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
The event is held at Microsoft Limited, Cardinal Place, 100 Victoria Street SW1E 5JL,
London.
</p>
        <p>
Update: Here's the <a href="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/london2009_may.zip">presentation</a>.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8" />
      </body>
      <title>Speaking at Document Interop Initiative</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
On Monday, 05/18/2009 I'm speaking at &lt;a href="http://www.documentinteropinitiative.org/"&gt;Document
Interop Initiative&lt;/a&gt; in London, England.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Title of the talk is: &lt;em&gt;High Fidelity Programmatic Access to Document Content&lt;/em&gt;,
which will cover the following topics:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Importance of OOXML as a standards based format, especially in technical issues of
long term storage for document content preservation 
&lt;li&gt;
Importance of legal long term storage for document formats 
&lt;li&gt;
Signature and timestamp benefits of long term XML formats 
&lt;li&gt;
Performance and actual cost analysis of using publicly-parsable formats 
&lt;li&gt;
Benefits of having a high fidelity programmatic access to document content, backed
with standardization&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The event is held at Microsoft Limited, Cardinal Place, 100 Victoria Street SW1E 5JL,
London.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Update: Here's the &lt;a href="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/london2009_may.zip"&gt;presentation&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,e75263af-f55d-4b9e-9e70-9c503ae86ce8.aspx</comments>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Work</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I'm sorry it took a week, but here we go.
</p>
        <p>
This is my exit content from <a href="http://www.bleedingedge.si/">Bleeding Edge 2008</a>.
I'm also posting complete conference contents, just in case.
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/be2008.jpg" />
        </p>
        <p>
Thanks go out to <a href="http://blogs.solidq.com/EN/dzupancic/default.aspx">Dušan</a>, <a href="http://blogs.solidq.com/EN/dsarka/default.aspx">Dejan</a>, <a href="http://www.mihavalencic.com/?p=124">Miha</a>, <a href="http://cs.rthand.com/blogs/blog_with_righthand/archive/2008/10/03/Material-from-my-_2200_Make-ORM-applications-more-secure_2F00_Naredimo-ORM-aplikacije-varnej_6101_e_2200_-presentation.aspx">Miha</a> and <a href="http://www.krneki.net/blog/">Miha</a>.
</p>
        <p>
Downloads:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
Middle Tier Design Unleashed: <a href="http://downloads.request-response.com/BleedingEdge2008_MiddleTier.zip">PPT
&amp; Code</a></li>
          <li>
Complete Conference: <a href="http://downloads.request-response.com/BleedingEdge2008.zip">PPT
&amp; Code</a></li>
        </ul>
        <p>
          <font color="#808080" size="1">Remark: PPT in Slovene only. Code international.</font>
        </p>
        <p>
Thank you for attending. Hope to see you next year!
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438" />
      </body>
      <title>Bleeding Edge 2008: Postback</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I'm sorry it took a week, but here we go.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is my exit content from &lt;a href="http://www.bleedingedge.si/"&gt;Bleeding Edge 2008&lt;/a&gt;.
I'm also posting complete conference contents, just in case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/content/binary/be2008.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks go out to &lt;a href="http://blogs.solidq.com/EN/dzupancic/default.aspx"&gt;Dušan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blogs.solidq.com/EN/dsarka/default.aspx"&gt;Dejan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.mihavalencic.com/?p=124"&gt;Miha&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://cs.rthand.com/blogs/blog_with_righthand/archive/2008/10/03/Material-from-my-_2200_Make-ORM-applications-more-secure_2F00_Naredimo-ORM-aplikacije-varnej_6101_e_2200_-presentation.aspx"&gt;Miha&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.krneki.net/blog/"&gt;Miha&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Downloads:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Middle Tier Design Unleashed: &lt;a href="http://downloads.request-response.com/BleedingEdge2008_MiddleTier.zip"&gt;PPT
&amp;amp; Code&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Complete Conference: &lt;a href="http://downloads.request-response.com/BleedingEdge2008.zip"&gt;PPT
&amp;amp; Code&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font color=#808080 size=1&gt;Remark: PPT in Slovene only. Code international.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thank you for attending. Hope to see you next year!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,3e45c176-f86b-4b60-b0a5-9425631e2438.aspx</comments>
      <category>CLR</category>
      <category>Conferences</category>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Web Services</category>
      <category>Work</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
There is some serious pain going on when you need to add a simple <em>custom document
property</em> into multiple Word 2007 text areas.
</p>
        <p>
Say you have a <strong>version property</strong> that you would need to update using
the document property mechanics. And say you use it in four different locations inside
your document.
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
There is no <em>ribbon command</em> for it. There was a menu option in Word 2003 days.</li>
          <li>
There is no simple way of adding to <em>The Ribbon</em>. You have to customize
the Quick Access Toolbar and stick with ugly, limited use icons forever or so.</li>
          <ul>
            <li>
You need to choose <font face="Courier New">All commands</font> in <font face="Courier New">Customize
Quick Access Toolbar</font> to find <font face="Courier New">Insert Field</font> option.</li>
          </ul>
          <li>
This is not the only limiting option for a power user. The number of simplifications
for the casual user is equal to the number of limitations for the power user. And
yes, I know, casual users win the number battle.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/wordinsertfield.jpg" />
        </p>
        <p>
So:
</p>
        <ol>
          <li>
Right click <em>The Ribbon</em> and select <font face="Courier New">Customize Quick
Access Toolbar</font></li>
          <li>
Select <font face="Courier New">All Commands</font> and <font face="Courier New">Insert
Field</font></li>
          <li>
Add it to <font face="Courier New">Custom Quick Access Toolbar</font></li>
          <li>
Click the new icon</li>
          <li>
In <font face="Courier New">Field names</font> select <font face="Courier New">DocProperty</font></li>
          <li>
Select your value, in this example <font face="Courier New">Version</font></li>
        </ol>
        <p>
Yes. <strong>Ease of use.</strong></p>
        <p>
Please, give me an option to get my menus and keyboard shortcuts back.
</p>
        <p>
Pretty please.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9" />
      </body>
      <title>Problem: Adding custom properties to document text in Word 2007</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
There is some serious pain going on when you need to add a simple &lt;em&gt;custom document
property&lt;/em&gt; into multiple Word 2007 text areas.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Say you have a &lt;strong&gt;version property&lt;/strong&gt; that you would need to update using
the document property mechanics. And say you use it in four different locations inside
your document.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
There is no &lt;em&gt;ribbon command&lt;/em&gt; for it. There was a menu option in Word 2003 days.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
There is no simple way of adding to &lt;em&gt;The&amp;nbsp;Ribbon&lt;/em&gt;. You have to customize
the Quick Access Toolbar and stick with ugly, limited use icons forever or so.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
You need to choose &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;All commands&lt;/font&gt; in &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Customize
Quick Access Toolbar&lt;/font&gt; to find &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Insert Field&lt;/font&gt; option.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
This is not the only limiting option for a power user. The number of simplifications
for the casual user is equal to the number of limitations for the power user. And
yes, I know, casual users win the number battle.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/wordinsertfield.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Right click &lt;em&gt;The Ribbon&lt;/em&gt; and select &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Customize Quick
Access Toolbar&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Select &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;All Commands&lt;/font&gt; and &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Insert
Field&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Add it to &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Custom Quick Access Toolbar&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Click the new icon&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
In &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Field names&lt;/font&gt; select &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;DocProperty&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
Select your value, in this example &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Version&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yes. &lt;strong&gt;Ease of use.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please, give me an option to get my menus and keyboard shortcuts back.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Pretty please.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,839bd119-ae37-45d1-9652-a02006342aa9.aspx</comments>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Personal</category>
      <category>Work</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
WS-RM 1.1 is finished. GoodTimes<sup>tm</sup>.
</p>
        <p>
OASIS published two specs:
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <a href="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-os-01.html">WS-ReliableMessaging
1.1</a>
          </li>
          <li>
            <a href="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html">WS-ReliableMessaging
Policy Assertions 1.1</a>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
WCF, as it turns out, will have support for WS-RM 1.1 implementation in Orcas. On
this note, there is a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e6fd8663-8b77-4649-8d36-3830e18528fa&amp;DisplayLang=en">new
CTP</a> out this week.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471" />
      </body>
      <title>Out the Door: WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
WS-RM 1.1 is finished. GoodTimes&lt;sup&gt;tm&lt;/sup&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
OASIS published two specs:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-os-01.html"&gt;WS-ReliableMessaging
1.1&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html"&gt;WS-ReliableMessaging
Policy Assertions 1.1&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
WCF, as it turns out, will have support for WS-RM 1.1 implementation in Orcas. On
this note, there is a &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e6fd8663-8b77-4649-8d36-3830e18528fa&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en"&gt;new
CTP&lt;/a&gt; out this week.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,c6dac5cb-596b-4836-ab83-9802e54d2471.aspx</comments>
      <category>.NET 3.5 - WCF</category>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Web Services</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate, $499.
</p>
        <p>
Apple iPhone, $599.
</p>
        <p>
Jobs and Gates sitting <a href="http://d5.allthingsd.com/20070530/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-together-part-1-of-7/">together</a>.
Priceless.
</p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f" />
      </body>
      <title>All Things Digital: Jobs + Gates</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:14:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate, $499.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Apple iPhone, $599.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jobs and Gates sitting &lt;a href="http://d5.allthingsd.com/20070530/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-together-part-1-of-7/"&gt;together&lt;/a&gt;.
Priceless.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f4b0538e-b90e-4c6e-abd4-c4903d21fa4f.aspx</comments>
      <category>Apple</category>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Other</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Well, it took me awhile to figure out, but here's a way to bring back the dialog
which allows you to resize image attachments you send in Outlook 2007.
</p>
        <p>
It's hidden the behind right arrow of the Include box. Right here:
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/outlookresize1.jpg" />
        </p>
        <p>
I knew it must be there somewhere. And it is, it's just a <strong><em>click away</em></strong>.
</p>
        <p>
It must be me, but I was looking for this option for a couple of months. It was one
of my beloved features in Outlook 2003, since sending snapshots of something allowed
me to get them down from 5MB to 100kb by just clicking an option.
</p>
        <p>
There is a special checkbox called 'Show when attaching files' there.
</p>
        <p>
          <img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/outlookresize2.jpg" />
        </p>
        <p>
Turn it on. Now.
</p>
        <p>
Who decided it's a good thing to leave this thing off by default?
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db" />
      </body>
      <title>Resizing Image Attachments in Outlook 2007</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 21:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Well, it took me&amp;nbsp;awhile to figure out, but here's a way to bring back the dialog
which allows you to resize image attachments you send in Outlook 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It's hidden the behind right arrow of the Include box. Right here:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/outlookresize1.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I knew it must be there somewhere. And it is,&amp;nbsp;it's just a &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;click away&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It must be me, but I was looking for this option for a couple of months. It was one
of my beloved features in Outlook 2003, since sending snapshots of something allowed
me to get them down from 5MB to 100kb by just clicking an option.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There is a special checkbox called 'Show when attaching files' there.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.request-response.com/blog/images/outlookresize2.jpg"&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Turn it on. Now.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Who decided it's a good thing to leave this thing off by default?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,2005010a-e143-4228-864f-96e526a296db.aspx</comments>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
      <category>Personal</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>https://www.request-response.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>https://www.request-response.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Matevz Gacnik</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.request-response.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Microsoft is currently kicking Apple's ass.
</p>
        <p>
Well, this was a <strong>bold</strong> statement. Let me rephrase.
</p>
        <p>
Microsoft is winning the battle for the living room. It is well known, that whoever
wins this battle is going to win the war for 'Complete Media Experience'. Microsoft's
strategy is based on <a href="http://www.xbox.com">Xbox 360</a>, <a href="http://www.zune.net">Zune</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/default.mspx">Windows
Media Center</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista">Windows
Vista</a>.
</p>
        <p>
On November 22<sup>nd</sup> one will be <a href="http://www.xbox.com:80/en-US/community/news/2006/20061106-moviestv.htm">able
to watch</a> a TV show, sync with Zune, play music/games and stream videos
on an Xbox.
</p>
        <p>
Apple should be doing this, but they are late in the game. A full screen iPod is lagging.
So is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITV_(Apple)">iTV</a>. There is still no
product in the public pipeline that could compete with Media Center. It's video offering
is, at this time, shameful.
</p>
        <p>
It's going to be a fun 2007.
</p>
        <p>
          <font color="#808080">-- This post was written on my </font>
          <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac">
            <font color="#808080">iMac</font>
          </a>
          <font color="#808080">.
Just to balance out the subjectivity.</font>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16" />
      </body>
      <title>Battle for the Living Room</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16.aspx</guid>
      <link>https://www.request-response.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft is currently kicking Apple's ass.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Well, this was a &lt;strong&gt;bold&lt;/strong&gt; statement. Let me rephrase.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft is winning the battle for the living room. It is well known, that whoever
wins this battle is going to win the war for 'Complete Media Experience'. Microsoft's
strategy is based on &lt;a href="http://www.xbox.com"&gt;Xbox 360&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.zune.net"&gt;Zune&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/default.mspx"&gt;Windows
Media Center&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista"&gt;Windows
Vista&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On November 22&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt; one will be &lt;a href="http://www.xbox.com:80/en-US/community/news/2006/20061106-moviestv.htm"&gt;able
to watch&lt;/a&gt; a TV show, sync with Zune, play music/games&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;stream videos
on an Xbox.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Apple should be doing this, but they are late in the game. A full screen iPod is lagging.
So is &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITV_(Apple)"&gt;iTV&lt;/a&gt;. There is still no
product in the public pipeline that could compete with Media Center. It's video offering
is, at this time, shameful.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It's going to be a fun 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font color=#808080&gt;-- This post was written on my &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/imac"&gt;&lt;font color=#808080&gt;iMac&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font color=#808080&gt;.
Just to balance out the subjectivity.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="https://www.request-response.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>https://www.request-response.com/blog/CommentView,guid,cdc83234-de0c-4205-a4f4-91bd8a26af16.aspx</comments>
      <category>Apple</category>
      <category>Microsoft</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>